For me, it was Mad Magazine (Don Martin, in particular).Viking-Sensei wrote:The first thing "Poit" puts me in mind of is Pinky from Pinky and The Brain.
See also: http://www.kaitou.org/comic/archives/4
For me, it was Mad Magazine (Don Martin, in particular).Viking-Sensei wrote:The first thing "Poit" puts me in mind of is Pinky from Pinky and The Brain.
Well, well, isn't there a difference between large physical phenomenons and a humanoid CREATING one out of SHEER MENTAL POWER and big enough to move a fleet?Slamlander wrote:So you don't like Stargate either? Einstein himself suggested wormholes.Madayar wrote:I will not converse about the absurdity of travelling through holes in space, this is high fantasy, physics stays out of it from page 1
You want to maybe describe what you're seeing in these panels that's so theoretically awesome? Cause I was having trouble putting together exactly what was depicted (besides the obvious "ship goes into hole"), and I think I probably know my theoretical physics better than the average forumgoer (though there are some here who probably know better than I; I believe at least one someone here is an actual, practicing physicist).Bytemite wrote:
Inner and outer horizons, white hole interior region, Schwarzschild wormholes! Poe is a genius! Theoretical physics are win!
Much with the radiation. Including ship sized radiation and whole-people radiation out the other end.
Back to lurking.
Slamlander wrote:So you don't like Stargate either? Einstein himself suggested wormholes.Madayar wrote:I will not converse about the absurdity of travelling through holes in space, this is high fantasy, physics stays out of it from page 1
...Madayar wrote:Well, well, isn't there a difference between large physical phenomenons and a humanoid CREATING one out of SHEER MENTAL POWER and big enough to move a fleet?Slamlander wrote:So you don't like Stargate either? Einstein himself suggested wormholes.Madayar wrote:I will not converse about the absurdity of travelling through holes in space, this is high fantasy, physics stays out of it from page 1
Actually, I was only referencing the wormhole bit. Implementation effects differ with the author. In fact, my own are much less dramatic. On the other hand, this is not much conceptually different than a portal.l33tm44m wrote:Good thing this WASN'T Stargate. The wormhole would have had a giant unstable "splash" wave like a jet engine being run through a tank of water (that's how they did the special effect for the first time in the STARGATE movie. They totally CGd the effect afterwards for the TV series.)Slamlander wrote:So you don't like Stargate either? Einstein himself suggested wormholes.Madayar wrote:I will not converse about the absurdity of travelling through holes in space, this is high fantasy, physics stays out of it from page 1
And THAT is why I wrote "I will NOT CONVERSE" on it, and it is "HIGH FANTASY". You were the one who brought Einstein into it. Who is besides "Presence of the Master" a non-fictional person. But Bytemite won the "explain the inexplicable" award anyway. And got a comic quoting him. Hell.Slamlander wrote: I might remind you that this is fiction. But with that attitude, you probably don't read much of it. Let your hair down, toss the tie, roll up your sleeves, and enjoy the show. Who knows, you might even learn to like it
Actually, I was only referencing the wormhole bit. Implementation effects differ with the author. In fact, my own are much less dramatic. On the other hand, this is not much conceptually different than a portal.
... I suddenly feel the urge to demand a drawing of Einstein dressed up as "Albert Einstein, Catgirl Exterminator".Madayar wrote:You were the one who brought Einstein into it.