2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

For talking about the plot, the art, the dialogue, the characters, the site, and the individual updates...
User avatar
BandMan2K
Errant Scholar
Posts: 119
Joined: August 21st, 2007, 2:54 am
Location: 1280 College St. Arkham, MA.
Contact:

Re: 2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

Post by BandMan2K »

We're missing the most important thing here: Kawaii on panels 5 & 6 looked so extra cute that I'm REALLY wanting to pinch those rosy cheeks of hers...and gladly take the consequences (i.e. - End of Life.)

Now with that, let's see if my ability to kill a thread by posting in it holds up.
For god so loved the world that he sent his only begotten son to draw tentacle raped dickgirls that who so ever shall masturbate to them will not perish but enjoy everlasting orgasm.

-Book of Ghastly 3:16
No One
Errant Scholar
Posts: 191
Joined: August 27th, 2007, 8:59 am

Re: 2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

Post by No One »

Hmm... I'm going to take anything Chicanery says with an extra-large grain of salt, given that her name literally means deception.
Initial B
Mage/Priest War Veteran
Posts: 258
Joined: August 20th, 2007, 6:56 am
Location: I'm Canadian, eh?

Re: 2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

Post by Initial B »

Leave it to Ellis to tell it how he sees it. I don't think he was born with the tact gene.

"Compensating for something"? I'm beginning to wonder if Anilis and Senilis are actually Bimbo and Ralph from EN, and maybe Exitialis is Jordan...
User avatar
Slamlander
Keeper of the Holy Algorithms
Posts: 1081
Joined: August 20th, 2007, 2:14 am
Location: Nyon, CH, near Geneve, on the shores of the Lac Leman. The heart of Suisse Romande.
Contact:

Re: 2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

Post by Slamlander »

Forrest wrote:I recall Luminosita being called "semi-autonomous" or something along those lines once. Still a far step from sapience though. (Rant-tangent: argh it's not "sentience"! Dang dogs and cats and mice are all sentient, but none of them are sapient! [Though some pet owners would argue about that]. Sentient just means "feeling" [lit. "sensing"], it's sapient that means "thinking" [lit. "wise"], viz. "homo sapiens", meaning "thinking man" or "wise man").

There are a whole boatload of Science Fiction writers that would certainly disagree with you.
S L A M L A N D E R
Image
Isn't Sarine technically a MILF?
User avatar
Graybeard
The Heretical Admin
Posts: 7182
Joined: August 20th, 2007, 8:26 am
Location: Nuevo Mexico y Colorado, Estados Unidos

Re: 2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

Post by Graybeard »

Rakshasa Taisab wrote:
mindstalk wrote:Except that there's still every reason to believe that the elven 'gods' did create everybody, while Luminosita was made by people. Also, the elven gods are a lot more advanced.
I was referring to them being sentient magical energy balls (post-humanoid or what ever), while the poke-god was merely a ball of magical energy.
Remember that we don't have an "objective" view of Luminosita to work from, at least not yet. You certainly don't expect Jon or Meji to be detached in their view of him, do you? Sarine could have been more so, in principle, but like all the other elves, she was locked away inside Praenubilus Astu when he came calling, and would only have been able to observe what happened when he hit their barrier, not Luminosita himself. Anita's view is just as slanted as Jon's and Meji's. And Ian, pre-Anilis, was strangely quiet on Luminosita during his long soliloquy on creation myths, or maybe he just hadn't got to the subject yet by the time Jon and Meji got bored and fell asleep. Given that (apart from his dislike of the elves and everything associated with them) he appears to have been almost spot-on regarding Anilis and Senilis, his view of Luminosita might have been interesting ... so, of course, Poe couldn't tell us what it was. ;)
Image

Because old is wise, does good, and above all, kicks ass.
runic
Errant Scholar
Posts: 249
Joined: September 4th, 2007, 3:26 pm

Re: 2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

Post by runic »

wrog wrote:Or we have the Messed Up Colony Ship Scenario (i.e., elves as colonists travelling in steerage, Anilis/Senilis/etc as crewmembers with access to Advanced Stuff, ... sort of like Zelazny's Lord of Light ...)
that brings me back to xenogears, except for the who made who part of the equation
User avatar
Forrest
Finally, some love for the BJ!
Posts: 977
Joined: August 21st, 2007, 12:49 pm
Location: The Edge of the Earth
Contact:

Re: 2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

Post by Forrest »

Slamlander wrote:There are a whole boatload of Science Fiction writers that would certainly disagree with you.
Yes, that's why it inspired a rant.
-Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
User avatar
mindstalk
Typo-Seeking Missile
Posts: 916
Joined: November 9th, 2007, 10:05 am
Contact:

Re: 2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

Post by mindstalk »

Graybeard wrote:
Rakshasa Taisab wrote:
mindstalk wrote:Except that there's still every reason to believe that the elven 'gods' did create everybody, while Luminosita was made by people. Also, the elven gods are a lot more advanced.
I was referring to them being sentient magical energy balls (post-humanoid or what ever), while the poke-god was merely a ball of magical energy.
Remember that we don't have an "objective" view of Luminosita to work from, at least not yet. You certainly don't expect Jon or Meji to be detached in their view of him, do you? Sarine could have been more so, in principle, but like all the other elves, she was locked away inside Praenubilus Astu when he came calling, and would only have been able to observe what happened when he hit their barrier, not Luminosita himself. Anita's view is just as slanted as Jon's and Meji's. And Ian, pre-Anilis, was strangely quiet on Luminosita during his long soliloquy on creation myths, or maybe he just hadn't got to the subject yet by the time Jon and Meji got bored and fell asleep. Given that (apart from his dislike of the elves and everything associated with them) he appears to have been almost spot-on regarding Anilis and Senilis, his view of Luminosita might have been interesting ... so, of course, Poe couldn't tell us what it was. ;)
Well:
http://www.errantstory.com/2003-10-13/156

"these aren't holy places, there was places forbidden to travel to". Seem to have been both, really.

http://www.errantstory.com/2003-08-25/137
we know the priests lie about the elven barrier.

http://www.errantstory.com/2003-08-27/138
Meji gives the Tsuirakuan view, down to bizarro versions of evolution, along with the crackpot view of "we were all placed here by a group of superadvanced alien life forms", which is silly because they also go on about elven and Veracian conspiracies and Northern Confederacy technology. Of course, we now know the conspiracies are real, the dwarves and their tech was real whether or not the Confederacy is using it.

Huh, you're right, he doesn't mention Luminosita here.
User avatar
Slamlander
Keeper of the Holy Algorithms
Posts: 1081
Joined: August 20th, 2007, 2:14 am
Location: Nyon, CH, near Geneve, on the shores of the Lac Leman. The heart of Suisse Romande.
Contact:

Re: 2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

Post by Slamlander »

Forrest wrote:
Slamlander wrote:There are a whole boatload of Science Fiction writers that would certainly disagree with you.
Yes, that's why it inspired a rant.
and then there is that person that wrote about fuzzy sapien's ....

But I've often wondered if there can be sapience without sentience ;)
S L A M L A N D E R
Image
Isn't Sarine technically a MILF?
User avatar
Forrest
Finally, some love for the BJ!
Posts: 977
Joined: August 21st, 2007, 12:49 pm
Location: The Edge of the Earth
Contact:

Re: 2009-10-14: Stop asking questions.

Post by Forrest »

Slamlander wrote:and then there is that person that wrote about fuzzy sapien's ....
I don't get this reference. Explain?
But I've often wondered if there can be sapience without sentience ;)
I would say no, as sapience consists of reflexive sentience. (i.e. if sentience is "awareness", then sapience is "self-awareness"). But sentience without sapience is quite common; most sentient things are not sapient. Sapient things are a narrow subset of sentient things, which is why I'm a stickler for the right terminology: "sentience" is a much broader claim than "sapience", so saying something is "non-sentient" is equating it with something like a plant or at most maybe a goldfish, which is a bit much to say when all you meant to say is that something is not self-aware or conscious like a human.
-Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
Post Reply