2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
-
- Mage/Priest War Veteran
- Posts: 564
- Joined: January 1st, 2011, 11:45 pm
2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
Discussion thread for A Singular Experience
-
- Mage/Priest War Veteran
- Posts: 293
- Joined: April 17th, 2010, 2:50 am
Re: 2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
ok, ever since the page where she was getting worried about making herself seem bad by comparison I wondered, why is she building her boyfriend a sexbot (I assumed she wanted threesomes).
But then I went back and reread the old pages and she is building her as a date for the elf. (instead of just saying she isn't friends with ann anymore)
Since he isn't her boyfriend, what does she care if about how the two of them compare?...
and by the time I finished writing out this long elaborate question I got my answer. Elf is close enough to her boyfriend's that they are going to compare girlfriends.
But then I went back and reread the old pages and she is building her as a date for the elf. (instead of just saying she isn't friends with ann anymore)
Since he isn't her boyfriend, what does she care if about how the two of them compare?...
and by the time I finished writing out this long elaborate question I got my answer. Elf is close enough to her boyfriend's that they are going to compare girlfriends.
-
- Errant Scholar
- Posts: 154
- Joined: November 25th, 2009, 10:10 am
- Contact:
Re: 2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
Well there certainly is that. Then there's also that Jordan is just the sort of petty asshole who would have been jealous even if the sexbot was going to someone she'd never see again.taltamir wrote: Elf is close enough to her boyfriend's that they are going to compare girlfriends.
As to Jordan's speech about robots and sapience, here here, well said.
- Forrest
- Finally, some love for the BJ!
- Posts: 977
- Joined: August 21st, 2007, 12:49 pm
- Location: The Edge of the Earth
- Contact:
Re: 2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
I'm more concerned over the philosophical implications of something which "thinks it's sapient, but really isn't". That... doesn't seem like something that should be possible.
Something that produces sounds that say "I'm sapient", sure, doesn't have to be; I can make my computer do that and it's not sapient. But Jordan speaks as if the sexbot actually thinks it's sapient, but is wrong about that, which just doesn't make any sense.
I'm also unconvinced that it's possible to emulate sapience without actual sapience. You could have a sapient entity pretend to have different thoughts and feelings than it really does -- you could, say, have a central AI which is truly sapient, and controls a bunch of different robot bodies like finger puppets, affecting in each the mannerisms of a fictional character it's improvising lines for on the spot; and you could embed that AI in just one body, and have it continue the act still -- but behind the act there's still a sapient mind. If there isn't one, something capable of doing the introspection for the facade character (thinking "what would this character think and feel in reaction to this experience?", modeling another hypothetical or fictional mind with the kind of understanding that another actual mind can have), then you would in principle be able to tell some functional difference in the facade that would tip you off that it's not really sapient.
Something that produces sounds that say "I'm sapient", sure, doesn't have to be; I can make my computer do that and it's not sapient. But Jordan speaks as if the sexbot actually thinks it's sapient, but is wrong about that, which just doesn't make any sense.
I'm also unconvinced that it's possible to emulate sapience without actual sapience. You could have a sapient entity pretend to have different thoughts and feelings than it really does -- you could, say, have a central AI which is truly sapient, and controls a bunch of different robot bodies like finger puppets, affecting in each the mannerisms of a fictional character it's improvising lines for on the spot; and you could embed that AI in just one body, and have it continue the act still -- but behind the act there's still a sapient mind. If there isn't one, something capable of doing the introspection for the facade character (thinking "what would this character think and feel in reaction to this experience?", modeling another hypothetical or fictional mind with the kind of understanding that another actual mind can have), then you would in principle be able to tell some functional difference in the facade that would tip you off that it's not really sapient.
-Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
-
- Errant Scholar
- Posts: 209
- Joined: February 14th, 2011, 1:35 am
Re: 2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
Depends on what standards you're using for defining sapience. The fact is, we don't have a good definition of what it even means to be sapient. Also, how do we know that it 'thinks' it's sapient? It just says that it thinks it's sapient.Forrest wrote:I'm more concerned over the philosophical implications of something which "thinks it's sapient, but really isn't". That... doesn't seem like something that should be possible.
-
- Mage/Priest War Veteran
- Posts: 293
- Joined: April 17th, 2010, 2:50 am
Re: 2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
pfft, I remember when sentient was all the rage, then we had to come up with sapient as a (completely unnecessary) clarification.Forrest wrote:I'm more concerned over the philosophical implications of something which "thinks it's sapient, but really isn't". That... doesn't seem like something that should be possible.
but, it should be entirely possible (although godly difficult) to make something that isn't sapient and is programmed to think it is. Because what is thought? Though is internal monologue, which you can program a non sapient thing to perform. Furthermore, any complex bit of code is comprised of multiple modules. This applies to both computers and humans. Your braincells actually have votes (the votes are fully analog. so a cell can vote +60 miliamps, +59, +58, etc. none of this "yes/no" or "yes/no/maybe" nonsense)
- dark_lord_zagato
- Mage/Priest War Veteran
- Posts: 253
- Joined: July 27th, 2012, 12:05 pm
- Location: Aberdeen, Washington
- Contact:
Re: 2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
Perhaps we are not actually sapient and evolution has just built us to think that we are? I can see this girl quickly becoming the biggest source of annoyance in Jordan's life, especially if she points out the obvious flaw in Jordan's explanation and keeps insisting that she is sapient.
- Graybeard
- The Heretical Admin
- Posts: 7182
- Joined: August 20th, 2007, 8:26 am
- Location: Nuevo Mexico y Colorado, Estados Unidos
Re: 2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
"I think I think. Therefore I think I am. I think."
-- Descartes, I think.
-- Descartes, I think.
Because old is wise, does good, and above all, kicks ass.
-
- Mage/Priest War Veteran
- Posts: 293
- Joined: April 17th, 2010, 2:50 am
Re: 2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
just wait until she starts calling jordan "mom"dark_lord_zagato wrote:Perhaps we are not actually sapient and evolution has just built us to think that we are? I can see this girl quickly becoming the biggest source of annoyance in Jordan's life, especially if she points out the obvious flaw in Jordan's explanation and keeps insisting that she is sapient.
- Graybeard
- The Heretical Admin
- Posts: 7182
- Joined: August 20th, 2007, 8:26 am
- Location: Nuevo Mexico y Colorado, Estados Unidos
Re: 2014-03-23: A Singular Experience
Wonder if Poe follows the webcomic "Sinfest"? This arc is beginning to feel like a send-up of the tendentious and preachy "Fembot" threads over there.
Because old is wise, does good, and above all, kicks ass.